Downstream CBAM Could Bring Renewable Electricity Deeper into Steel Supply Chains

By J.L.
4 Min Read

Supported by CBAM.Clarion.Engineer

Fasteners, wire, springs and other fabricated steel products sit closer to final customers than primary steel. For their manufacturers, electricity procurement is therefore becoming part of a broader competitiveness strategy rather than simply a utility purchasing decision.

The proposed expansion of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) could strengthen this connection by bringing selected steel- and aluminium-intensive downstream goods within its scope from 2028.

Current rules and proposed expansion must remain distinct

For iron-and-steel and aluminium goods currently listed in Annex II, the existing CBAM calculation takes account of direct emissions. Renewable electricity procurement can deliver substantial operational, customer, financing and decarbonisation benefits without automatically reducing current certificate liability through purchased-electricity emissions.

The same legislative file proposes extending CBAM downstream coverage from 2028 to selected steel- and aluminium-intensive products. Both the Council and the European Parliament support expansion, but their proposed product lists differ and remain subject to negotiation. Until final legislation is adopted, the existing scope remains the operating baseline.

If the expansion proceeds, EU importers will need emissions information from manufacturers that may not yet have mature CBAM data systems. Renewable electricity contracts can support corporate decarbonisation and product-carbon-footprint work, but the associated evidence must be linked to production and product allocation rather than presented as generic plant-wide proof.

Energy suppliers can support product-level evidence

Traders and independent power producers (IPPs) can strengthen their offering through granular generation data, relevant Guarantees of Origin (GoOs) and stable long-term pricing. Manufacturers must then integrate these inputs into their own production records and customer-facing evidence rather than transferring responsibility for product claims to the electricity supplier.

This creates potential demand for energy suppliers, engineers and verifiers serving smaller industrial sites. Aggregated renewable procurement may help reduce transaction costs, while robust installation records, metering and product-allocation controls can help keep claims specific and defensible.

Where customers request low-carbon steel, producers should define the product boundary and allocation methodology before attributing a renewable-electricity benefit to particular goods. This reduces the risk of spreading a plant-wide energy claim across more tonnes than the underlying evidence supports.

Electricity evidence enters financing decisions

Banks financing export manufacturers may increasingly examine whether electricity contracts, supplier data and customer reporting systems are sufficiently robust to protect sales into the EU market. As a result, electricity evidence can become relevant to working-capital facilities and credit assessments, in addition to sustainability reporting.

Steel buyers should continue to assess renewable electricity against a defined energy, customer or decarbonisation benefit rather than a generic CBAM saving that the current product methodology does not support.

Proposed reforms could change electricity treatment

The separate legislative proposal COM(2025) 989 would materially revise electricity treatment, including the methodology for electricity default values and certain conditions for using actual values. It would broaden the concept of physical power purchase agreements to include intermediaries and change elements of the congestion and nomination framework.

The Council adopted its negotiating position on 12 June 2026, followed by the European Parliament on 15 September 2026. The proposal remains under interinstitutional negotiation and must not be treated as enacted law.

The deeper CBAM coverage extends into finished goods, the more electricity procurement may become part of supply-chain planning. Its contribution, however, must be assessed alongside process emissions, material inputs and the specific requirements applicable to each product.

Share This Article
error: Content is protected !!